Supreme Court temporarily allows military ban that called trans servicemembers selfish and lacking humility. Why? No reason, says majority opinion

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling today, the Trump administration’s transgender military ban will remain in place and can be enforced while litigation continues in the lower courts.

Courthouse News: Supreme Court says transgender troops can be booted from military, handing win to Trump (archive) (2025-05-06):

Transgender Americans can be banned from military service, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday, allowing the Trump administration to expel thousands of active-duty troops.

In a short order, the justices cleared the way for the White House to begin enforcing its prohibition on transgender service members. The court did not explain its order.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January declaring transgender Americans unfit for duty, stating that honoring the “falsehood” of their chosen gender identity was “not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member.”

Washington Post: Supreme Court allows military to ban transgender troops while case continues (archive) (2025-05-26):

The case now goes back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which will hear the Trump administration’s appeal of the lower court’s ruling.

The Pentagon, which issued a new policy based on Trump’s order in February, ordered each branch to identify service members with gender dysphoria within 30 days and to begin removing them from the service within 30 days after that. The order allows exceptions for troops directly supporting “warfighting capabilities.”

Troops that obtain a waiver to stay in the military will face additional restrictions, including not being able to access changing rooms, bathrooms and showers for people of the sex they transitioned to. They will also have to meet the physical standards associated with their birth sex.

Chris Geidner: Breaking: Supreme Court allows Trump’s anti-trans military ban to go into effect (archive) (2025-05-06):

While there will now be some legal complications given the procedural posture in Talbott — the D.C. Circuit’s administrative stay of Reyes’s ruling remains in effect and the motions panel heard arguments over the stay pending appeal request last month but has not yet issued a ruling — the Supreme Court’s message is clear that the ban will go into effect.

First, procedurally, there is no bar to the Defense Department’s implementation of the anti-trans ban. Second, the D.C. Circuit is almost certain to either go along with the Supreme Court’s order and issue a similar order in Talbott or ask for follow-up briefing from the parties on the effect of Tuesday’s order.

Eventually then, the Ninth Circuit and D.C. Circuit will consider the merits of the government’s appeal and the losing party there can appeal to the Supreme Court — but the ban will remain in effect during that entire time.

As such, trans people will be kicked out of the military and lose their career during that time only because they are trans and the Trump administration has decided — as has happened many times with other groups throughout our history — that such status is “incompatible” with military service.

Lambda Legal and Human Rights Campaign Foundation: Statement (archive) (2025-05-06):

Today’s Supreme Court ruling is a devastating blow to transgender servicemembers who have demonstrated their capabilities and commitment to our nation’s defense. By allowing this discriminatory ban to take effect while our challenge continues, the Court has temporarily sanctioned a policy that has nothing to do with military readiness and everything to do with prejudice. Transgender individuals meet the same standards and demonstrate the same values as all who serve. We remain steadfast in our belief that this ban violates constitutional guarantees of equal protection and will ultimately be struck down.

Washington Blade: Supreme Court allows Trump admin to enforce trans military ban (archive) (2025-05-06):

SPARTA Pride also issued a statement:

“The Roberts Court’s decision staying the preliminary injunction will allow the Trump purge of transgender service members from the military to proceed.

“Transgender Americans have served openly, honorably, and effectively in the U.S. Armed Forces for nearly a decade. Thousands of transgender troops are currently serving, and are fully qualified for the positions in which they serve.

“Every court up to now has found that this order is unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the Roberts Court – without hearing any evidence or argument – decided to allow it to go forward. So while the case continues to be argued, thousands of trans troops will be purged from the Armed Forces.

“They will lose their jobs. They will lose their commands, their promotions, their training, pay and benefits, and time. Their units will lose key players; the mission will be disrupted. This is the very definition of irreparable harm.”

Military.com: Supreme Court Allows Transgender Military Ban to Take Effect While Court Battles Proceed (archive) (2025-05-06):

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted on social media after the ruling that there will be “No More Trans @ DoD.” The Defense Department offered no further comment on Tuesday afternoon.

Trans troops say Pentagon causing chaos with sudden policy reversal (Task & Purpose)

From Task & Purpose: Transgender troops say Pentagon is causing chaos with sudden policy reversal (2025-03-03) (archive):

Holder is among thousands of transgender service members who say they are angry, disillusioned and anxious after Pentagon moves that appear to mean the end of their time in uniform. They say they have worked hard to serve their country and meet standards of military service — standards the Pentagon set for them in a series of policies dating back to 2016 — and now that work is being thrown away and the rug pulled out from under them. […]

“Service by these individuals is not in the best interests of the Military Services and is not clearly consistent with the interests of national security,” the memo filed in the lawsuit says. […]

Lindsay Church, a Navy veteran and executive director of Minority Veterans of America, noted that “beyond the baseline inhumanity of the policy”, the sudden separation directive will lead to negative impacts on the transition to civilian life. They noted that transgender veterans face higher risks of housing and health issues as well as suicide. A 2019 study found that “transgender veterans die by suicide at twice the rate of their cisgender veteran peers and approximately 5.85 times the rate of the general population.”

One recent veteran suicide gained attention. On Jan. 27, nonbinary Army veteran Elisa Rae Shupe killed themselves at a parking garage used by the Syracuse VA, less than a week after being discharged. Shupe, who served nearly two decades in uniform, became the first American to get legal recognition as nonbinary. Syracuse.com first reported on Shupe’s death. A witness Task & Purpose spoke with confirmed that Shupe’s body was wrapped in the transgender pride flag. Several vigils have been held for Shupe in multiple cities since then. […]

Beyond concerns over mental and physical health, transgender troops also face the upcoming loss of their jobs. The policy directs separation in roughly 60 days. The Pentagon also said that service members who choose to leave voluntarily have a 30-day window to do so. They will be eligible for voluntary separation pay. As a result, many military members said they are looking at major life changes. […]

Others noted that losing troops, particularly those with experience and specific training, could cause harm for military effectiveness. Holder noted that her unit has to plan for losing several of its members as a result of the ban, including linguists with years of experience.

  • Attachment: ECF No. 63-1 in Talbott v. Trump, 1:25-cv-00240, (D.D.C. Feb. 26, 2025) [PDF]
    • Title: Memorandum for Senior Pentagon Leadership/Commanders of the Combatant Commands/Defense Agency and DOD Field Activity Directors; Additional Guidance on Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness
    • Author: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense; Darin S. Selnick (“Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness”)
    • Date: February 26, 2025

Trump admin: Trans servicemembers must quit Air Force by March 26 (The Advocate)

Trump administration says trans service members have until March 26 to quit Air Force (The Advocate, 2025-03-02) (archive) [emphasis added]:

The Trump administration has escalated its efforts to purge transgender service members from the military, urging them to voluntarily separate by March 26—or face an uncertain future.

The directive, outlined in a March 1 memorandum from the Department of the Air Force, was filed Sunday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as part of Talbott v. Trump, a legal challenge brought by GLAD Law and the National Center for Lesbian Rights. The memo, signed by Acting Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs Gwendolyn R. DeFilippi, states that individuals with gender dysphoria are “incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary for military service.”

Transgender service members “are encouraged to elect to separate voluntarily no later than 26 March 2025,” the memo states. “Service members eligible for voluntary separation pay will be paid at a rate that is twice the amount for which the service member would have been eligible under involuntary separation pay.” The memo applies explicitly to Air Force and Space Force members, though other branches are expected to follow suit.

The document also confirms that previous waivers allowing them to use facilities and grooming standards consistent with their gender identity have been revoked effective immediately. Transgender personnel must now adhere to so-called “biological sex” standards for uniforms, grooming, fitness requirements, and access to showers, bathrooms, and lodging, it notes.

  • Attachment: ECF No. 67-1 in Talbott v. Trump, 1:25-cv-00240, (D.D.C. Mar. 2, 2025) [PDF]
    • Title: MEMORANDUM FOR ALMAJCOM-ALFLDCOM-FOA-DRU/CC DISTRIBUTION C; Additional Guidance for Executive Order 14183, “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness”
    • Author: Department of the Air Force, Office of the Assistant Secretary; Gwendolyn R. DeFilippi, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
    • Date: March 1, 2025